Parametric models deployed in non-stationary environments degrade as the underlying data distribution evolves over time (a phenomenon known as temporal domain drift). In the current work, we present KOMET (Koopman Operator identification of Model parameter Evolution under Temporal drift), a model-agnostic, data-driven framework that treats the sequence of trained parameter vectors as the trajectory of a nonlinear dynamical system and identifies its governing linear operator via Extended Dynamic Mode Decomposition (EDMD). A warm-start sequential training protocol enforces parameter-trajectory smoothness, and a Fourier-augmented observable dictionary exploits the periodic structure inherent in many real-world distribution drifts. Once identified, KOMET's Koopman operator predicts future parameter trajectories autonomously, without access to future labeled data, enabling zero-retraining adaptation at deployment. Evaluated on six datasets spanning rotating, oscillating, and expanding distribution geometries, KOMET achieves mean autonomous-rollout accuracies between 0.981 and 1.000 over 100 held-out time steps. Spectral and coupling analyses further reveal interpretable dynamical structure consistent with the geometry of the drifting decision boundary.

Electroencephalography (EEG)-based emotion recognition suffers from severe performance degradation when models are transferred across heterogeneous datasets due to physiological variability, experimental paradigm differences, and device inconsistencies. Existing domain adversarial methods primarily enforce global marginal alignment and often overlook class-conditional mismatch and decision boundary distortion, limiting cross-corpus generalization. In this work, we propose a unified Prototype-driven Adversarial Alignment (PAA) framework for cross-corpus EEG emotion recognition. The framework is progressively instantiated in three configurations: PAA-L, which performs prototype-guided local class-conditional alignment; PAA-C, which further incorporates contrastive semantic regularization to enhance intra-class compactness and inter-class separability; and PAA-M, the full boundary-aware configuration that integrates dual relation-aware classifiers within a three-stage adversarial optimization scheme to explicitly refine controversial samples near decision boundaries. By combining prototype-guided subdomain alignment, contrastive discriminative enhancement, and boundary-aware aggregation within a coherent adversarial architecture, the proposed framework reformulates emotion recognition as a relation-driven representation learning problem, reducing sensitivity to label noise and improving cross-domain stability. Extensive experiments on SEED, SEED-IV, and SEED-V demonstrate state-of-the-art performance under four cross-corpus evaluation protocols, with average improvements of 6.72\%, 5.59\%, 6.69\%, and 4.83\%, respectively. Furthermore, the proposed framework generalizes effectively to clinical depression identification scenarios, validating its robustness in real-world heterogeneous settings. The source code is available at \textit{https://github.com/WuCB-BCI/PAA}

Several recent works have shown that state-of-the-art classifiers are vulnerable to worst-case (i.e., adversarial) perturbations of the datapoints. On the other hand, it has been empirically observed that these same classifiers are relatively robust to random noise. In this paper, we propose to study a semi-random noise regime that generalizes both the random and worst-case noise regimes. We propose the first quantitative analysis of the robustness of nonlinear classifiers in this general noise regime. We establish precise theoretical bounds on the robustness of classifiers in this general regime, which depend on the curvature of the classifier's decision boundary. Our bounds confirm and quantify the empirical observations that classifiers satisfying curvature constraints are robust to random noise. Moreover, we quantify the robustness of classifiers in terms of the subspace dimension in the semi-random noise regime, and show that our bounds remarkably interpolate between the worst-case and random noise regimes. We perform experiments and show that the derived bounds provide very accurate estimates when applied to various state-of-the-art deep neural networks and datasets. This result suggests bounds on the curvature of the classifiers' decision boundaries that we support experimentally, and more generally offers important insights onto the geometry of high dimensional classification problems.

Precision medicine aims to tailor therapeutic decisions to individual patient characteristics. This objective is commonly formalized through dynamic treatment regimes, which use statistical and machine learning methods to derive sequential decision rules adapted to evolving clinical information. In most existing formulations, these approaches produce a single optimal treatment at each stage, leading to a unique decision sequence. However, in many clinical settings, several treatment options may yield similar expected outcomes, and focusing on a single optimal policy may conceal meaningful alternatives. We extend the Q-learning framework for retrospective data by introducing a worst-value tolerance criterion controlled by a hyperparameter $\varepsilon$, which specifies the maximum acceptable deviation from the optimal expected value. Rather than identifying a single optimal policy, the proposed approach constructs sets of $\varepsilon$-optimal policies whose performance remains within a controlled neighborhood of the optimum. This formulation shifts Q-learning from a vector-valued representation to a matrix-valued one, allowing multiple admissible value functions to coexist during backward recursion. The approach yields families of near-equivalent treatment strategies and explicitly identifies regions of treatment indifference where several decisions achieve comparable outcomes. We illustrate the framework in two settings: a single-stage problem highlighting indifference regions around the decision boundary, and a multi-stage decision process based on a simulated oncology model describing tumor size and treatment toxicity dynamics.

For classification tasks, the performance of a deep neural network is determined by the structure of its decision boundary, whose geometry directly affects essential properties of the model, including accuracy and robustness. Motivated by a classical tube formula due to Weyl, we introduce a method to measure the decision boundary of a neural network through local surface volumes, providing a theoretically justifiable and efficient measure enabling a geometric interpretation of the effectiveness of the model applicable to the high dimensional feature spaces considered in deep learning. A smaller surface volume is expected to correspond to lower model complexity and better generalisation. We verify, on a number of image processing tasks with convolutional architectures that decision boundary volume is inversely proportional to classification accuracy. Meanwhile, the relationship between local surface volume and generalisation for fully connected architecture is observed to be less stable between tasks. Therefore, for network architectures suited to a particular data structure, we demonstrate that smoother decision boundaries lead to better performance, as our intuition would suggest.

We present a formulation of deep learning that aims at producing a large margin classifier. The notion of \emc{margin}, minimum distance to a decision boundary, has served as the foundation of several theoretically profound and empirically successful results for both classification and regression tasks. However, most large margin algorithms are applicable only to shallow models with a preset feature representation; and conventional margin methods for neural networks only enforce margin at the output layer. Such methods are therefore not well suited for deep networks. In this work, we propose a novel loss function to impose a margin on any chosen set of layers of a deep network (including input and hidden layers). Our formulation allows choosing any $l_p$ norm ($p \geq 1$) on the metric measuring the margin. We demonstrate that the decision boundary obtained by our loss has nice properties compared to standard classification loss functions. Specifically, we show improved empirical results on the MNIST, CIFAR-10 and ImageNet datasets on multiple tasks: generalization from small training sets, corrupted labels, and robustness against adversarial perturbations. The resulting loss is general and complementary to existing data augmentation (such as random/adversarial input transform) and regularization techniques such as weight decay, dropout, and batch norm.

This paper presents enhancements to the projection pursuit tree classifier and visual diagnostic methods for assessing their impact in high dimensions. The original algorithm uses linear combinations of variables in a tree structure where depth is constrained to be less than the number of classes -- a limitation that proves too rigid for complex classification problems. Our extensions improve performance in multi-class settings with unequal variance-covariance structures and nonlinear class separations by allowing more splits and more flexible class groupings in the projection pursuit computation. Proposing algorithmic improvements is straightforward; demonstrating their actual utility is not. We therefore develop two visual diagnostic approaches to verify that the enhancements perform as intended. Using high-dimensional visualization techniques, we examine model fits on benchmark datasets to assess whether the algorithm behaves as theorized. An interactive web application enables users to explore the behavior of both the original and enhanced classifiers under controlled scenarios. The enhancements are implemented in the R package PPtreeExt.

Typically, DNNs suffer from drastic performance degradation of previously learned tasksafterlearning newknowledge, which isawell-documented phenomenon, knownascatastrophic forgetting [8,9,10].

However,maximum-marginclassifiers areinherently robusttoperturbations ofdata at prediction time, and this implication is at odds with concrete evidence that neural networks, in practice, are brittle toadversarial examples [71]and distribution shifts [52,58,44,65]. Hence, the linear setting, while convenient to analyze, is insufficient to capture the non-robustness of neural networkstrainedonrealdatasets.Goingbeyondthelinearsetting,severalworks[ 1,49,74]arguethat neuralnetworksgeneralize wellbecause standard training procedures haveabiastowardslearning